Prepared for Andrew Kalogirou

Yellow Brick Road

Your client documents, handled.

An adaptive document intake system for your team — proven on your exact problem before you spend a dollar.

Andrew Kalogirou — Yellow Brick Road  ·  3 June 2026  ·  Valid until 17 June 2026
Email us to go ahead →
The short version

700 documents a month, handled — without the workflow your team hates

Your team handles around 700 client documents a month across three branches. Today that means hours of manual reading, relabelling and filing for every application. You've already seen what happens when that gets automated badly: a well-funded, AWS-backed build spent close to two years and a reported ~$170,000 and never got past the first stage. It broke on a single interstate licence, and every change meant going back to the vendor.

This proposal is different in one important way: the hard part is already proven. We ran your exact problem — the six situations that stalled the last build, plus six real phone-photo IDs — and it cleared all of them.

~3 hrs/dayadmin time targeted back
6 / 6prior failure modes cleared
~700documents a month handled
Where you are now

The budget was never the problem. The approach was.

You run a busy YBR franchise: 11 brokers, three branches, around 45 settlements a month and roughly 700 client documents flowing through a shared admin inbox. Every application means someone opening attachments, working out what each document is, renaming it to your convention, filing it into the right client folder, and checking it against a compliance checklist that changes regularly. It works, but it eats the time your team should be spending with clients.

You tried to fix this once already. The previous provider, brought in through AWS, invested close to two years and a reported ~$170,000. It never got past stage one. It broke when a Western Australian licence didn't match the format it expected, and adapting to anything new meant a fresh quote and a wait — sometimes months. A new compliance checklist landed the day before we first spoke, which is exactly the kind of change that approach can't keep up with.

A rigid system, in an industry where the rules never stop moving, was always going to stall.

Proven before you spend a dollar

We ran your problem first

Before asking you to spend anything, we built a realistic application pack and seeded it with the six situations that broke your last build — then ran six real phone-photo IDs through the same reading layer: three states, an overseas passport, a Medicare card.

Test results on real phone photos

Six real documents, photographed on a phone the way a client would. Each one identified and read correctly.

100%document-type ID
0critical errors
6real IDs, 5 formats
1fake ID caught

The six situations that stalled the last build — all cleared

Masked account number (XXXX XXXX) — read as a masked number; real name found elsewhere.

Middle-name variant — matched to the same person, flagged to confirm.

Joint account — assigned to both applicants, routed for your policy.

Home-loan statement, no name — linked by property address.

Two documents in one PDF — read both, clean split proposed.

Unknown document — preserved and labelled, never discarded.

The solution

An intake system that adapts instead of breaking

The difference between this and what you had is one word: adaptive. The old system worked off fixed rules, so every new bank layout, unusual document or compliance change meant going back to the vendor, paying more and waiting. This reasons about what it's looking at the way a trained admin would — so a new format or a new checklist is just another day. When compliance changes, it adapts. You don't lodge a change request, and you don't wait three months.

01

It collects

An always-on layer watches the application inbox and picks documents up the moment they arrive. No change for brokers or clients.

02

It understands

Every document is read in context, not pattern-matched — a tax return from a payslip, a taxpayer from their accountant.

03

It files & checks

Renamed to your convention, filed into the right client folder, and checked against your current compliance checklist.

04

It reports

The broker gets one clean summary: filed, outstanding, financial flags, and a copy-paste block for your CRM.

Example broker summary email

What the broker receives for every application. (Sample shown on synthetic data — fully tweakable to your format.)

Security & privacy

How your clients' data is handled

You're handling identity documents and financial records, so this matters as much as the result.

A full Statement of Work will set out scope, data handling, responsibilities and terms — including that the AI is not responsible for credit, financial or compliance decisions, which remain with your qualified team — before any real documents are touched.

The value

What this is worth to the branch

Illustrative, using your own numbers from our call. Final figures depend on your volumes and how you redeploy the time.

Admin time back
Hours → minutes
per application

Your goal: free ~3 hours a day of admin time. At ~21 working days that's about 60 hours a month back to client-facing work — plus fewer errors and faster turnaround.

New capacity
~$5k–$9.8k/mo
added commission, estimated

If the time your team gets back goes into clients instead of paperwork, we estimate $5,000–$9,800 a month in added commission from more client-facing time. Illustrative, and dependent on how the time is used.

Vs the last attempt
~$23k vs ~$170k
weeks, not years

The previous build reportedly ran close to ~$170,000 over nearly two years and stalled at stage one. Pilot plus full deployment here is $23,000 + GST total — live in weeks.

One-off investment (pilot + full deployment)$23,000 + GST
Admin time reclaimed — ~60 hrs/mo × ~$40/hr≈ $2,400 / mo
+ added commission from more client time (estimated)≈ $5,000–$9,800 / mo
Combined value back≈ $7,400–$12,200 / mo
Payback period≈ 2–3 months

Conservative read: on reclaimed admin time alone the build pays for itself in roughly 9–10 months. Added client-facing commission brings payback to about 2–3. Figures are estimates and depend on how the reclaimed time is used.

Investment

Build your engagement

One build, delivered in two stages. Phase 2 follows a successful pilot. All prices + GST.

Your engagement · two stages, one build

Phase 1 — Paid Pilot START HERE

Live on your real client documents for ~2 weeks, running on your existing admin PC — no new hardware or infrastructure. Tested against your actual naming convention and current compliance checklist. One clear success bar: 90% accuracy on documents a person can read. Fully refundable if it doesn't clear that bar.
$5,000 + GST

Phase 2 — Full Deployment

The full system live for your whole team, running on a dedicated machine in your office: always-on collection, reading and filing to Drive, compliance-checklist matching, and a broker summary for every application. Follows a successful pilot.
$18,000 + GST
Combined engagement
$23,000 + GST
Optional Add-on

Team AI Enablement

One session for all 11 brokers plus admin: best-practice prompting, which AI to use for what, and hands-on help rolling out a Claude Team plan across the group. Add at any time.
+$5,000 + GST
Tap to add
Your investment
$23,000 + GST
Ongoing costs

The only ongoing cost is a Claude Max plan, billed directly by Anthropic — not by us. For your volume (~700 documents a month across three offices), budget roughly $150–$300 AUD / month + GST; we confirm the exact tier during the pilot from your real usage. No NxtLayr retainer is required to keep it running.

You've seen what the alternative costs. A reported ~$170,000 and nearly two years got stuck at stage one. This gets you past it — and keeps you there.
Beyond the pilot

The road this opens up

The pilot and first deployment solve document intake. That same foundation is the start of a ladder you named yourself — scoped and quoted one build at a time, so you only ever pay for what's working:

Who you're working with

Built by a team that understands business and technology.

Chris Gulotta — Founder, NxtLayr AI
Chris GulottaFounder & CEO, NxtLayr AI

I've spent over a decade working with businesses — across sales, operations, and technology — and the one thing that's always been true is this: the businesses that move first win.

Before founding NxtLayr AI, I spent six years working in technology companies — in e-commerce and cybersecurity — selling to businesses of every size, understanding their operations, and seeing firsthand where they were leaving money on the table. The answer was almost always the same: too much time on manual work, too many leads slipping through the cracks, and not enough hours in the day.

I started NxtLayr AI because I saw a gap. The AI tools that could genuinely transform a business were out there — but nobody was making them accessible to the businesses that needed them most: manufacturing, industrial, professional services, construction, real estate, and trades. Companies with real operations, real complexity, and real opportunity to gain an edge. That's what we do.

This proposal is the result of that process — a genuine look at your business, your challenges, and where AI can make the biggest difference. I work on every engagement personally.

10+Years in business & technology
6Years in tech companies
50+AI solutions deployed
Proven results

Australian businesses are already seeing results.

Every engagement starts with the same kind of proof you're reading now. Here's what that's led to for businesses like yours.

Trusted by

Corecast Concrete Scott & Co X-Dental Fast Funding Tyre & Wheel
★★★★★

"We brought Chris from NxtLayr in to consult for us. He ran an AI audit which found a few gaps in our process. We're a concrete business and before meeting Chris I assumed AI couldn't do much for us. The team is fully in the know and using the AI system every day now for quoting, writing scopes, admin, and more."

Tom BacheOwner, Corecast Concrete
★★★★★

"I was hearing a lot about AI but not knowing where to start. Chris was very knowledgeable and patiently explained the advantages. Many of his recommendations were surprisingly low cost and easy to use. The audit paid for itself already, and we plan to engage NxtLayr AI to automate more processes."

Paul NicholsonBusiness Owner, Tyrepower
★★★★★

"In an evolving area Chris is really on top of what's available and how these can add real value to your business."

Brendan SmithDirector, Scott & Co Accountants & Financial Planning
Case Study · Corporate Advisory
6+ hrs

a week back to the director — client emails drafted and every call written up, automatically.

Live in < 2 weeks

from kickoff to two AI agents running.

A corporate advisory firm's director was spending half his day in his inbox, not advising clients.

Every client email was written from scratch, and every meeting needed a careful written follow-up. The work that actually grows the firm — advising clients — kept getting pushed behind admin.

We built an email agent that drafts replies in his own voice straight into his inbox, and a call agent that turns every client meeting into a clean summary with action items, ready for the file. He reviews and sends. The blank page is gone, and the partner's time goes back to clients.

Next step

Ready when you are — live by the end of June

Email us to go ahead. We'll collect the initial pilot payment and sign a Statement of Work with you — including the confidentiality clauses that protect your clients' data — and start building straight away. Expected live by the end of June.

Email us to go ahead →

Chris Gulotta · NxtLayr AI · 0477 018 400 · hello@nxtlayrai.com

NxtLayr AI · hello@nxtlayrai.com · nxtlayrai.com